Working towards more inclusive housing provision

Working towards more inclusive housing provision

There is currently a serious lack of provision and funding for supported housing services for those in need of it within the LGBTQ+ community.

There are nationwide calls for the understanding of the specific needs and possible disadvantages faced by some members of the community to be embedded into housing practices beyond the delivery of homes and tenures.

The resignations of three government LGBTQ+ advisors in early March has brought national attention to the absence of knowledge around the current needs of the community, as well as the lack of will to change things for the better.

In this hostile environment, organisations cannot rely on regulatory guidance to protect people and help them to thrive. As such, the sector must take actions into their own hands.

A third of LGBTQ+ social housing residents believed that their housing provider was not able to effectively deal with incidences of harassment. Stonewall’s Cake Bennet delved into this with a wealth of research and statistics back in February, building a picture of life in the UK for LGBTQ+ people.

Joint working between community organisations and housing providers is key to building better, more inclusive service provision. In aid of this, in 2020 Consortium released an LGBTQ+ housing manifesto in order to create a London-wide pathway to address the challenges faced, outlining what housing providers can do beyond regulatory compliance.

Equipping organisations to succeed

Housing providers are leaders in building inclusive organisations; in 2020 three housing associations made the top 100 employers in Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index.

Starting with good internal practices means that allocated individuals within an organisation can guide future actions and campaigns, as well as flag up any missteps that could occur.

In what is a shameful statistic, prior to a repairs operative turning up at a house, one in five gay men living in social housing have moved items (photos, books etc.) to hide their sexual orientation.

In order to build communities where everyone’s lives feel validated, housing providers can undertake training for all staff and partnering operatives with accreditation to help ease fears of discrimination on the basis on sexual orientation and gender identity.

As a tool for empowering residents and organisational accountability, the HouseProud Pledge scheme is gaining traction within the sector.

Its three leading factors are:

·      That at an executive and strategic level, LGBTQ+ residents can contribute input

·      Providing education at all levels of the organisation to improve understanding of LGBTQ+ lives

·      To visibly show allyship and provide resources

Better data

Within the sector, there can be no understanding of the effectiveness of such training and organisational change without collecting baseline data on the diversity of staff and residents from which to benchmark improvements.

For the time being, there are no official estimates on the proportion of social housing residents who identify as LGBTQ+. However, research from The Human City institute found that 4-6% of heads of households living in social homes identified as LGBTQ+ and 2.4% of board members identified as LGBT (2019).

The 2021 census is set to deliver a far more detailed picture of the spectrum of sexual orientation and gender identity in the UK.

For housing providers, including questions around gender identity and sexual orientation within their resident engagement could deliver better insights on how to adjust and build housing options services for future provision.

Ageing out

One of the biggest pieces of good news this spring was the announcement

from L&Q Group of the establishment of their first resident run co-housing scheme for older LGBTQ+ people. The scheme aims to provide spaces for those who want to continue living ‘out’ in mainstream provision after having fought hard to live their lives truthfully.

Research by Tonic Housing found that 56% of those asked wanted to retire into LGBTQ+ provision and 23% would feel satisfied with care homes that have community accreditation marking it a safe space.

Shouting with Pride

In order to belay fears of discrimination that prevent people accessing life-saving services, housing providers can become vocal, visible allies utilising their online platforms, communications and marketing.

Recommendations made by Stonewall Housing in their 2018 ‘Homes and Community’ report encourage publicised solidarity and support that signal an organisation as ‘safe’ to deal with.

“Even just seeing the acronym LGBT somewhere in a building can make a huge difference for people” Carin Tunåker, Porchlight

In the future, specialised services may become obsolete as societies become more tolerant; we can hope for a future where immutable tenets of our identities do not shape outcomes across health, wealth and opportunities. It is a future that is being imagined.

The Future Laboratory have predicted the ‘end of gender’, citing shifts in generational outlook as a primary driver. This vision pushes for a post-pandemic world where ‘getting back to normal’ is refuted – normal was not working anyway.

Instead, radically rethinking how to deliver services with inclusivity and mutual growth at its core can become a driver for building back better.

Insights

Related
Articles